Réponses

Accueil du MAECI

Politiques

Netcast

Message du Ministre

Document de réflexion

Répondre aux questions

Forum de discussion

FAQ | Règles de civilité | Participer

Réponses

Question 2: L'examen de la politique étrangère de 1995 et après

À la lumière de l’évolution de la situation mondiale, le Canada doit-il continuer à orienter sa politique étrangère en fonction d’une stratégie reposant sur les « trois piliers », ou doit-il plutôt rechercher un nouvel équilibre?

Voir toutes les réponses à la question 2
Participant:	1873
Date:	2003-05-01 09:48:08
Réponses:
A balanced three pillar approach is only as good as the foundation they rest on. Canada really doesn't have a balance at present. NAFTA dicates 85% of our trade and hence limits our ability and just as importantly, our willingness to promote ourselves in other trading blocks. I was proud at Canada's recent stand against attacking Iraq, we took a peaceful stand against independent aggression. But we should be honest with ourselves. Promotion of prosperity and employment (NAFTA) dominates our thinking. We sell ourselves short by this process. We should work hard to shape Canada as a global think tank for world solutions. An environment where world citizens and leaders can come to explore and facilitate the promotion of values and culture aht Canadians cherish.
Voir toutes les réponses à la question 2