|
Contributor: codc01
Date: 2003-04-09 11:16:02
I guess its complex, since if they were going into Iraq for actually liberating the people of Iraq, I'd say its moral, but it would still be illegal, so i would still disapprove.
But we all know that the main reason for invading is something else (I have no idea which ones though, middle-east presence, friendly israel neighbour, oil, showing an exemple to other countries, etc, a terrorist threat according to the US) - then in that case its neither moral (but this depends on the eye of the beholder) nor legal.
If they would have invaded in 1988, even though i would still feel it was illegal, at least the moral justification would be much stronger than it is now.
Reply to this message
|
