DFAIT logo partnership The logo for the by design elab, an independent research development and production think tank specializing in online forums for policy development, incubated in 1997 at the McLuhan Program at the University of Toronto
DFAIT Home Site Map Help Policies Partners Feedback Netcast Français
 
Welcome
Message from the Minister
Dialogue Paper
Answer Questions
View Answers
Discussion Forum
 

Conclusion: The World We Want

Thank you for participating in the Dialogue on Foreign Policy. The interactive web site is now closed. The Minister's report will appear on this web site once it is released.

This Forum is bilingual, and participants post messages in their language of choice.

Perhaps the World we don't want

Contributor: fatmomma

Date: 2003-04-07 00:34:12


Maybe they are taking their lead from me; actually we are probably all responding to Mr Bush's demand for a "regime change". My views are my own but shared by other intelligent minds. I must admit I do admire Ramsey Clark but never read these words of his. Good to know he and I are on same wave length. As my mother's family can be traced to at least 8 generations born in Canada; yes, think I can safely say I AM CANADIAN. I want to keep Canada free; not some American satelite.
Tell me something. How can you admire and support a regime that produces fraudulent evidence of Iraq's WMD. That uses bribes and threats to try to sway countries to support its agenda. I have no strong political leanings. I only hope for a government that is fair and honest and listens to the wishes of the people. Mr Bush does not meet that criteria

Reply to this message

Show in topic

Perhaps the World we don't want

Contributor: Barretm82

Date: 2003-04-07 18:21:53


There is no doubt about WMD in Iraq. Are you so jaded that you are willing to overlook Saddam because you don't like the U.S. administration.

As for bribes and threats, that is how the U.N. has always functioned; time to change it to a humanitarian organization and perhaps a place to debate.

Look at what processes work at the U.N., keeping those and scrap what hasn't worked. IMO.

Reply to this message