DFAIT logo partnership The logo for the by design elab, an independent research development and production think tank specializing in online forums for policy development, incubated in 1997 at the McLuhan Program at the University of Toronto
DFAIT Home Site Map Help Policies Partners Feedback Netcast Français
 
Welcome
Message from the Minister
Dialogue Paper
Answer Questions
View Answers
Discussion Forum
 

Conclusion: The World We Want

Thank you for participating in the Dialogue on Foreign Policy. The interactive web site is now closed. The Minister's report will appear on this web site once it is released.

This Forum is bilingual, and participants post messages in their language of choice.

USA role in the UN

Contributor: cfallon

Date: 2003-04-01 11:58:13


These are valid questions.

Added to this list should be: why is the US responsible for 25% of the UN budget? Wouldn't we get less US influence in the UN if they were required to pay based on a per capita number?

There has been talk of moving the UN from New York in these discussion forums, and I think this is a great idea. But where?

I suggest it should NOT be in Europe or North America.

I think we should put it in a city that would benefit from the economic stimulus that such a headquarters brings to a city.

Some examples of the cities where the UN should be based: Kandahar, Damascus, Gaza City, Harare, Quito, Pyongyang, etc.

It would be no benefit to the world if the new UN headquarters wound up in Toronto, Tokyo, Milan or Miami.

Reply to this message

Show in topic