DFAIT logo partnership The logo for the by design elab, an independent research development and production think tank specializing in online forums for policy development, incubated in 1997 at the McLuhan Program at the University of Toronto
Printer friendly version of: http://www.foreign-policy-dialogue.ca/en/discussion/index.php?m=2894

Security

Thank you for participating in the Dialogue on Foreign Policy. The interactive web site is now closed. The Minister's report will appear on this web site once it is released.

This Forum is bilingual, and participants post messages in their language of choice.


 

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: codc01

Date: 2003-04-09 15:39:40


You maybe right, but the US did fire on the hotel, i saw it with my own eyes...

Of course, if it os true that it was because they were responding to fire, then i would understand... But it seems strange, that all journalists did not hear any shots fired before the tank fired... Unless the Iraqi fired exactly at the same time on the hotel...

Hmmm.. was this BBC Defence correspondent on the scene? Does not seem so, so i do believe more credible what the journalists on location said... But only a full investigation will give out the truth.

p.s : No offence taken...


Reply to this message

Show in topic

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: cfallon

Date: 2003-04-09 16:42:49


Its true, its impossible to believe that a hotel in which the Ministry of Information has set up temporarily (renovations on their building) could have had a couple of snipers hoping to draw the US military into a fight.

Afterall, Saddam's regime is all about keeping civilians out of harm's way. That's been there clarion call for 30 years now.

The journalists didn't hear shots? Well, I'm sure the CBC journalists didn't hear anything. They see no evil, hear no evil and say no evil unless the US has done it.

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: codc01

Date: 2003-04-09 17:10:58


You must be working for the CIA! :)

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: cfallon

Date: 2003-04-10 10:00:55


That's right:

the Canadian Integrity Agency. I'm just trying to keep Canada honest!

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: 1254

Date: 2003-04-09 20:23:05


Saw it with your own eyes? No. You saw what the media wanted you to see. I noted some machine gun fire coming in on a TV Camera (the "crack crack crack"). Very easy for you to sit in your comfy chair, weathering the Spanish Inquisition, and judge the action. I can't judge it (cause I wasn't there) and neither can you. I highly doubt, however, that US forces would shoot at ANY media! That being said, they probably got shot at from that general direction, noted the tall building as a possible roost for snipers, and let loose with their coaxial machine gun and NOT the main armament. We all saw what that 120mm gun can go (when that tank on the bridge shot that building). It doesn't matter that the tank was close: it's a chemical energy shell, exploding on contact, causing the same damage whether its fired from 200 metres or 2000 metres.

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: codc01

Date: 2003-04-10 05:07:28


"...I highly doubt, however, that US forces would shoot at ANY media"

Why, because its the US??

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: fatmomma

Date: 2003-04-10 22:46:05


You doubt the US would shoot at any media; 3 separate incidents in a short period of time on well known journalist housing.
I even heard the excuse that it wasn't the USA; that their shots were lower; Iraq dissidents probably shot the hotel at the same time. Yes sure.
Perhaps they only used their coaxial guns because they were sending a message; not a full out massacre. hmmm
Wouldn't want an outright blatant attack.
More like a warning shot with acceptable collateral damage.
Just a possible theory but very suspicious when 3 separate attacks in such a short period.

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: codc01

Date: 2003-04-11 06:48:03


The journalists did not hear one shoot 15 minutes preceeding the incident.

The explanations by the Pentagon:
First reason given : There shots being fired from the hotel.

Later in the day 2nd reason : Some people of the regime are residing in the hotel.

Finally, at the end of the day : The regime's people have armed bodyguards.

Frankly, if they were fired at, why did they change their reasons after?? Will there be a full investigation?



Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: Barretm82

Date: 2003-04-11 14:53:30


Fog of war...

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: codc01

Date: 2003-04-12 13:07:13


Yu agree with me there should an investigation, no? I understand Fog of War, not Fog of Justice.

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: Barretm82

Date: 2003-04-12 15:36:22


Yes, I agree with your concern. I don't think the soldiers should be put on the burner here.

I think the investigation should look at the dangers of reporters in combat zones and then impart ways to make it less deadly to them.

Just keep in mind the nature of combat is that bad things always happen.

Reply to this message

Journalists attacked..

Contributor: codc01

Date: 2003-04-13 14:28:18


Yes, i fully understand this, the only thing i want is an investigation, and i will accept their conclusions....

Reply to this message

Visit us online at: http://www.foreign-policy-dialogue.ca